2Brute2Best
πŸ”₯0
P3

Design Snake & Ladder

Easy Pro OnlyFactory MethodStrategy
⚑ 30-Second Interview Cheat SheetP3 · 45-Min Design Plan
3 Patterns Combined
1. Scope Boundaries

In a 45-minute LLD interview, the interviewer tests boundary condition management (exact-win overshoot logic, cycle prevention in obstacle layouts), deterministic testability (eliminating unmockable rand() calls via Strategy), and creational validation (verifying directional invariants like head > tail for snakes before board instantiation). Scope the solution to an arbitrary board dimension (e.g. 100 cells), pluggable dice rolling (DiceStrategy), obstacle mapping, and multiplayer FIFO rotation. Mention recursive obstacle chaining (springs/trampolines) and consecutive-roll bonus turns (rolling three 6s) as natural follow-up extensions.

2. Core Noun Entities
Jumper / IBoardModifierdata-struct
GameBoardstateful-class
DiceStrategy / IDiceinterface
Playerstateful-class
3. Hotspot β†’ Pattern
Dice roll generation (Random vs Mocked vs Crooked) β†’ Strategy (DiceStrategy / IDice interface implemented by StandardDice and DeterministicDice)
Obstacle instantiation and invariant validation β†’ Factory Method (JumperFactory centralizes boundary and directional validation)
Flexible board construction with arbitrary dimensions and obstacle sets β†’ Builder (BoardBuilder for fluent step-by-step board assembly)
01

Problem statement & clarifying requirements

Design an extensible Snake & Ladder game. The game must support configurable board sizes, custom placements of snakes and ladders created through a dedicated factory, pluggable dice rolling strategies (standard random 6-sided dice, deterministic sequences for testing, or crooked dice), and a clean turn-based multiplayer loop enforcing exact-win boundary rules.

Questions you should ask the interviewer first
β€œWhat happens if a player rolls a number that causes their position to overshoot the final cell?”

Enforce the exact-win rule: if currentPos + roll > boardSize, the player cannot move and forfeits their turn (remains at currentPos).

β€œCan snakes or ladders form recursive chains or cycles (e.g. landing on a ladder that takes you to a snake)?”

For standard interview scope, jumpers do not chain recursively (a jumper destination is an ordinary cell). The factory must reject cycles and invalid bounds (head <= tail for snakes, bottom >= top for ladders).

β€œHow are different dice types (single die, pair of dice, rigged/crooked dice) handled?”

Apply the Strategy pattern (DiceStrategy). Callers inject their preferred dice rolling implementation (StandardDice, DeterministicDice, CrookedDice) into the GameEngine.

β€œWhat is the player starting position?”

All players start at position 0 (off-board), and their first valid roll moves them directly onto the board.

02

First, sketch the design yourself

Spend 5 minutes listing the classes, who owns whom, and which interface hides the part that changes.

  1. 1.

    Encapsulate the creation and invariant validation of snakes and ladders inside a Factory Method (JumperFactory) to prevent invalid states like upside-down snakes or negative positions.

  2. 2.

    Decouple random dice rolling using the Strategy pattern (DiceStrategy). Never call std::rand() or <random> directly inside GameEngine, as this prevents deterministic testing.

  3. 3.

    Use a fluent Builder pattern (BoardBuilder) so clients can cleanly assemble boards with arbitrary dimensions and custom obstacle placements.

03

How to think through this problem (5-step walkthrough)

Step 1 Β· Scope the 45-minute target & core boundary

In a 45-minute LLD interview, the interviewer tests boundary condition management (exact-win overshoot logic, cycle prevention in obstacle layouts), deterministic testability (eliminating unmockable rand() calls via Strategy), and creational validation (verifying directional invariants like head > tail for snakes before board instantiation). Scope the solution to an arbitrary board dimension (e.g. 100 cells), pluggable dice rolling (DiceStrategy), obstacle mapping, and multiplayer FIFO rotation. Mention recursive obstacle chaining (springs/trampolines) and consecutive-roll bonus turns (rolling three 6s) as natural follow-up extensions.

Step 2 Β· Extract candidate nouns (and reject false classes)

Not every noun in the prompt deserves its own class. Separate dumb data structs from stateful managers, and turn trivial nouns into fields or enums.

Jumper / IBoardModifier
Value Struct

Obstacle model storing start, end, and type (SNAKE, LADDER). In simpler designs it serves as a pure value struct; when extended with dynamic obstacles (springs, teleporters, freeze traps), it acts as an IBoardModifier strategy interface.

GameBoard
Stateful Class / Manager

Encapsulates board dimension and an O(1) jumper destination map (std::unordered_map<int, int> jumpers_), computing destination cells and enforcing exact-win overshoot boundaries.

DiceStrategy / IDice
Abstract Interface

Strategy interface declaring roll(): int. Decouples game rules from random number generation, enabling StandardDice (randomized distribution), DeterministicDice (canned sequence for unit tests), and CrookedDice (custom weighted roll).

Player
Stateful Class / Manager

Represents an active participant with display name, unique identifier, and current board position integer.

GameEngine
Stateful Class / Manager

Orchestrates the turn loop, manages the player rotation queue (std::deque<Player>), invokes DiceStrategy, requests destination calculation from GameBoard, and detects winning states.

SquareColor / JumpResult
Reject as Class β†’ Field / Method

Trap noun β€” beginners often introduce dedicated SquareColor, BoardTile, or JumpResult classes. Visual tile colors belong in rendering/UI layers, and a jump result is simply a computed destination integer returned by GameBoard::getDestination(), requiring no persistent class.

Step 3 Β· Draft the naive design & spot what breaks

A beginner writes a single loop inside main() with a hardcoded int board[101] array and calls rand() % 6 + 1 directly on every roll. Testing edge cases (landing on a snake, climbing a ladder, exact-win overshoot) becomes non-deterministic and impossible to automate. Furthermore, without a creational factory or builder, invalid obstacle configurations (like upside-down snakes where head <= tail or cycle loops 14 -> 28 -> 14) corrupt the board state and trigger infinite loops during play.

Step 4 Β· Map change hotspots to design patterns
Dice roll generation (Random vs Mocked vs Crooked)β†’ Strategy (DiceStrategy / IDice interface implemented by StandardDice and DeterministicDice)

Calling std::rand() or <random> inside the game engine couples logic to system randomness, making unit testing and game replay verification impossible.

Obstacle instantiation and invariant validation→ Factory Method (JumperFactory centralizes boundary and directional validation)

Scattering boundary and directional checks across board setup creates duplicated validation and allows malformed jumpers into the system.

Flexible board construction with arbitrary dimensions and obstacle sets→ Builder (BoardBuilder for fluent step-by-step board assembly)

Passing dozens of snake and ladder coordinate pairs into a single monolithic GameBoard constructor leads to unwieldy, error-prone signatures.

Step 5 Β· Lock down C++23 ownership, invariants & concurrency
  • βœ“

    Jumper directional invariant: Every snake must satisfy head > tail, every ladder must satisfy bottom < top, and no jumper can originate at position 0 (start) or the final winning position (boardSize).

  • βœ“

    Exact-win boundary invariant: If currentPos + roll > boardSize, the move is invalid; the player remains at currentPos and forfeits their turn.

  • βœ“

    Ownership boundaries: GameEngine uniquely owns GameBoard and DiceStrategy via std::unique_ptr. GameBoard owns obstacle mapping without coupling to player state or turn rotation.

04

Entities & design patterns used

Brute2Best Pro Content

Unlock Full UML Diagram & C++23 Solution

The complete UML diagram, production-ready C++23 code, follow-up extensions, and design pitfall analysis are part of Brute2Best Pro. All 7 foundation chapters are 100% free.

All 440 visual dry runs & algorithms
Interactive step-by-step playback with pointer & array state transitions
52 comprehensive LLD chapters
Interactive UML diagrams, real-world stories (Food Delivery, Trading, RPG), and practice solutions
40 C++ basics labs & hardware memory models
Vtables, byte layouts, assembly insights, and multi-threading race conditions
Production-ready C++23 source code
Modern idioms, clean contracts, time/space complexity derivations, and interview takeaways

First anchor question per pattern, Part 1 LLD & Module 1 C++ basics are 100% Free forever.

Systems Integration

Related C++ Systems & Algorithmic Foundations

Deep dive into underlying layers